China is quick catching up to the remainder of the world in areas of technology. For example, they have educated thousands of oil and gas pipeline employees with the intention to be ready for the petroleum land battles which are sure to return.
China doesn’t merely import army data. It also uses the cultural artifacts of the West and incorporates them, not like, say, the Middle East.
China’s center class is rising exponentially.
China is household over the person; the group is main.
China is Confucian somewhat than Aristotelian or Christian (regardless of inroads, the state still controls the churches, at the least on the floor).
China is immense and possibly ungovernable in its current state. We may see it cut up over the approaching century.
So there’s the other side. Some consider that Google’s resolution to work inside the boundaries imposed by the Chinese authorities is simply the foot below the tent. As with all of the West’s earlier dealings with China, the latter will turn out to be extra Westernized and more open as a result of the contact. Thus, we ought to welcome the concept since it means China turns into less a threat to us.
Don’t overlook that China is full of younger, intelligent and nicely-educated men way over it actually knows what to do with since its inhabitants management policies have included the unintended consequence of thousands and thousands of aborted feminine fetuses.
These clever, bored “youthstake great pleasure in hacking, just for the sheer enjoyable of getting away with it. So guess what a lot of them will likely be doing once China has Google on board. That’s right: they’ll make Google’s entry into China the widening level of an already-growing chasm between younger and previous, bureaucrat and individual, son and family.
Ah, China: you could have once once more doomed yourself to dwell in attention-grabbing occasions.
Posted by Dymphna at 1/26/2006 08:Fifty four:00 AM 6 feedback Electronic mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Hill? Like Hell!
From The Drudge Report:
Thankfully for Mrs. Clinton, they don’t seem to be holding the subsequent presidential election any time soon…
Only 16 percent of voters are “firmlyin Hillary’s camp. Another 32 per cent would “considerMrs. Clinton for President.
However CNNGallup says that fifty one per cent say “no method, Jose.No Hillary. N-O.
As Drudge notes, which means her negatives outnumber her positives by three to at least one.
Amongst Republicans, 90 per cent perish the thought, but only 71 per cent of conservatives are that definite.
In the meantime, on the other facet of the divide, forty six p.c wouldn’t again Dr. Rice.
So there you’re. THREE Whole YEARS BEFOREHAND and they’re running these dumb polls and I am reporting it.
Attention-grabbing feel for issues, though. Wager ol’ Hillary will not be talking about the “plantation” once more anytime soon or they’re going to be throughout her like chocolate on New Orleans.
[Sorry. My new favourite phrase. Be patient; another one will ultimately change it. That is how it’s with pet phrases…]
Posted by Dymphna at 1/26/2006 12:12:00 AM 4 comments Electronic mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Wednesday, January 25, 2006
Get a real Hijab!
This won’t compute.
Michael Jackson, the world’s biggest pedophile and cross-dresser has discovered refuge in Bahrain. It seems he now wears the hijab; clearly he is discovered a spiritual home: He was sporting an abaya, a robe with long sleeves, below which his pants, white shirt and males’s shoes could possibly be seen, and his head and face had been wrapped in a black veil. He had black gloves on his hands.
The veil, abaya and gloves had been of a style typically worn by conservative Bahraini ladies, though Jackson appeared to be carrying them to hide his id.
With him was a woman additionally in an abaya and jeans and a scarf over her head that partially coated her face who had the 2 different children. All three youngsters’s faces have been wrapped in black scarves, and they wore yellow shirts and sweatpants or khakis with out robes. The girl’s id was not known.
Now the place within the Koran or the hadith is there room for chlorinated toluene tower this creature? You don’t know whether to snigger or cry.
It’s chuckle at his get-up and cry for his children/h2>
If he weren’t rich and famous, they’d have stoned him by now. At the very least.
Hat tip: Baron Bodissey, who definitely doesn’t need a hijab.
Posted by Dymphna at 1/25/2006 04:Fifty two:00 PM 2 comments Electronic mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Should Israel Be a part of NATO?
I can hear individuals squawking about this now, but what the hey. It’s a genius concept from the Heritage Basis if solely NATO has the proper anatomy to hold it off. Or possibly we may simply shoot it up with testosterone lengthy sufficient to get things going:
On the floor, Iran seems to have bested the international neighborhood in its pursuit of nuclear weapons. As former Secretary of State Colin Powell has noticed, after two years of fruitless negotiation, the international neighborhood is not any nearer to halting Iran’s quest for nuclear weaponsAs an alternative, the great powers endlessly debate where and when a diplomatic showdown will happen while Iran resumes its nuclear research. In essence, the world is fiddling while Rome burns. The West has one ace left to play before a remaining showdown looms. Extending NATO membership to Israel might convince Iran’s Mullahs that developing a nuclear functionality is not in their curiosity.
endless talks between the EU-3 (France, Britain, and Germany) and Tehran will not be solving the issue and will not disarm the Iranian regime. Behind the scenes of the negotiations, many in continental Europe secretly wish that the U.S. would simply accept the opportunity of an Islamic Republic of Iran with a nuclear arsenal. They ignore, nonetheless, the harsh actuality of such a foolhardy coverage. The fallout from inaction can be disastrous. An arms race in the area would ensue, with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt all vying to develop their very own nuclear weapons. Iran would change into more and more vociferous in its threats against Israel and could actively arm the myriad terrorist groups that depend on Tehran’s protection. Israel would not play along with this sport of Russian roulette. The world would shortly face a significant regional battle, presumably involving the use of nuclear weapons.
There’s a method out of the present diplomatic morass that may sign to the Mullahs in Tehran that the West is serious about reining in their nuclear ambitions, however with out permitting them to destabilize the Middle East. The United States ought to suggest the quick admission of Israel into the North Atlantic Treaty Group (NATO) as a full and equal member.
Israel meets NATO skills: it is a democracy, has a free market financial system, and is able to contribute to the common defense. In reality, unlike many new NATO members, it could be a web addition to the alliance, having raise and logistics skill, a second-to-none officer corps, and a first-charge military capable of all points of war-preventing. Israel spends nearly 10 % of its GDP on protection and has lively armed forces numbering 167,000 women and men, with 358,000 in reserve. It possesses as much as 200 nuclear warheads, as well as a properly-geared up Air Force and Navy.
Israel’s intelligence capabilities have been a significant asset in prosecuting the worldwide Battle on Terror, as few perceive the conflict so nicely. Like the U.S. and Great Britain, history has pressured Israel into being a real warrior nation. Its accession to NATO might only enhance the alliance’s capabilities.
Extra importantly, Israeli accession to NATO would explicitly prolong the Western alliance’s nuclear deterrent to cover Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Now it will be Tehran, and never the remainder of the world, that has a proliferation drawback. Any nuclear or standard assault on Israel, be it direct or by proxies resembling Hezbollah or different terrorist groups, can be met by a cataclysmic response from the West that will make the Battle of Omdurman seem like a stroll in the park…Israel’s accession would go away the Mullahs with no illusions about the West’s dedication to answer Iran’s strategic menace to the area.
Please learn the entire essay by John Hulsman and Nile Gardner, right here at the Heritage Basis . This may “confoundthe Iranians and let the EU3 get just a little rest from their Sisyphean labors.
Now, could we see a show of fingers here?
Posted by Dymphna at 1/25/2006 04:12:00 PM 5 feedback Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
The Calculus of Revenge
Mark Steyn’s current column, “Standing Small Against Iran Won’t Workdelivered to mind the years I spent immersed in the crises of home violence. Whoever first termed it “domestic terrorismwas proper. Although this was decades before Islamicists have been on the horizon, the similarities would turn out to be putting.
In his essay, Steyn pokes fun on the limp-wristed resolve of the EU three and their vicious counter-assaults on Iran. Britain is harrumphing about “narrowly targeted sanctions.That’ll put a scare into them. Germany thinks this is just too harsh, and La Belle is doing some nuklear saber-rattling however who believes Chirac on anything, even the color of his tie?
So what do these “world leaders+ Iran have to do with home violence? Effectively, let me give you a real-life example; see should you get the parallels.
Again within the mid-0s, while home violence was pretty much a grass-roots group, I admitted to our shelter a lady who’d had each eyes blackened by her abuser. Because the shock wore off, she was distraught, indignant and decided to finish the connection. We took photos of the injury for court docket, and went to the magistrate’s office. He appeared her over and filed charges for assault. Her abuser was picked up the next day, spent the night in jail, and at his preliminary listening to was given a court docket date and instructions on finding a lawyer. He was launched on his personal recognizance as he had no previous file, was steadily employed, and wasn’t going anywhere. In the judge’s opinion, he was a “gooddanger, although she ordered the man to avoid his sufferer. He proceeded to take action, never as soon as bothering her within the lead up to the trial.
In the meantime, she made common sense choices concerning dwelling arrangements. Someone else acquired her things from their house, she opened her own checking account, and set about trying to establish life on her personal.
She was nervous, although. “You don’t know him,she’d inform me time and again. Problem was, I did indeed know his pattern and thought her misgivings intuitively proper. Probably the most harmful time for a woman is after she leaves. This woman was residing in a hazard zone and she didn’t want me to tell her.
Court day came. The Commonwealth’s Legal professional had his ducks in a row: photos of my client’s broken face (now healing), testimony from the victim and her family the whole and usual thing in these circumstances.
The decide listened carefully to each sides before discovering the man responsible and sentencing him to six months, suspended, on the condition that he keep away from his wife. He had a good job, he seemed cheap and contrite six months probation and an “anger administration classin fact. He was to stay away from his victim.
After it was throughout, the abuser stopped the Commonwealth’s Lawyer as he was leaving court docket. The man’s curiosity was within the particulars of his sentence: solely six month’s probation for damaging his wife’s eyes like that? The Commonwealth’s Attorney, who hated these guys, answered tersely, “yeah. It’s not nearly enough. Stay the hell away from her.The man rocked back on his heels once or twice and seemed to ponder this. “Six months probation, huh?The CA pushed past him.
You possibly can guess the remainder of the story. Throughout the week, my shopper was hospitalized, having been severely beaten. Her abuser was out on bail this time, which was set at $25,000.00. His household helped him raise the share for the bondsman. After i saw him, he informed me it was the six monthsprobation that made his assault irresistible. “Only six months,he said. “It was price it./p>
The later circumstances are less clear now. I consider he was sentenced to a 12 months within the county jail. What stayed with me, though, was this man’s cool evaluation of danger versus payoff. To his way of thinking, he made a rational choice and was prepared to pay the consequences for inflicting that amount of pain.
Identical factor with Iran. A terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. Whether within the privacy of his dwelling or as the head of state, there’s always the calculus of pay-off. And sometimes, to their twisted way of thinking, it’s merely price the worth they have to pay.
Pray for Israel and the people of Iran.
Posted by Dymphna at 1/25/2006 12:04:00 AM 6 feedback Electronic mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Boring As a Gnat’s Fart
Today, CNN ran an Associated Press report a few showdown at the border between Mexicans dressed in navy uniforms and Texas legislation officers.
CNN managed to make this story exceedingly boring, scratching the floor of an necessary problem whereas employing a method so flat you could nod off before reaching the tip of what they needed to say.
Most significantly, although, they provide no background past the usual 00 sightings of Mexican military, and so on.Nothing to add to what we already know, and nothing of substance.
The MSM is the junk meals of knowledge nutrition.
Why? Is it just ineptitude? Do they not care about American sovereignty? They might have been speaking a couple of showdown in Sri Lanka for all the import their story carried.
Meanwhile, one other member of the MSM, The Washington Times, was all over this story like chocolate on New Orleans. They usually filed their studies final week, for Heaven’s sake. That they had names, numbers, complications and possible options.
Reporter Jerry Seper wrote two tales on the problems we’re having at the border, and columnist Tony Blankley took the governmental bureaucracy to process for its failure to lead or for that matter, even to comply with.
On January seventeenth, The W.T. Insider had the first story. Our report, “Mexican Navy Now Invading Our Bordersand the hyperlink to Seper’s report here: The U.S. Border Patrol has warned agents in Arizona of incursions into the United States by Mexican soldiers “trained to escape, evade and counterambush” if detected — a state of affairs Mexico denied yesterday. The warning to border Patrol agents in Tucson, Ariz., comes after increased sightings of what authorities described as closely armed Mexican army units on the U.S. side of the border. The warning asks the brokers to report the scale, exercise, location, time and equipment of any units observed.
Then, on January 19th, Seper again reported on the situation, with extra background and a few data relating to a program, “Red Zonethat has been funded however has not been applied. Arizona Congressional representative, Rick Renzi, wrote to Secretary of State Rice describing the events at our border with Mexico as “narco-terrorism in its purest kind:br>“Our borders are beneath assault by refined organizations that have no qualms about firing on our Border Patrol units,Mr. Renzi stated. “As we get tougher and extra dedicated, so do the organizations committed to smuggling death and terror our borders./p>
And where is CNN in all this? Asleep at the wheel, or doing busy work with its story on Disney’s acquisition of Pixar.
Examine the three reviews, two from The Washington Instances, and the one in the present day from CNN (a week later) and judge for yourself. Who’s reporting the news and who is going through the motions?
As a commenter stated of the story on the vandals who have been sentenced just lately for his or her destruction of Republican vans more than a year in the past in the run-up to the final Presidential election, “Why didn’t we hear about this?Why, certainly? The Milwaukee paper carried the story but it surely doesn’t appear to have been picked up or remarked upon within the wider media.
Don’t you surprise why CNN’s large story was Disney acquisition of Pixar? Sure, it issues if in case you have inventory in both firm, however other than that it’s trivial.
Possibly that’s the problem with CNN? It can’t inform the trivial from the important.
Compared to our critical, complex, and sure explosive problems with Mexico, the Disney and Pixar story is a gnat’s fart.
Hat tip: Baron Bodissey.
Posted by Dymphna at 1/24/2006 09:Forty seven:00 PM 7 comments E-mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Milwaukee Should Have Tried Sister AgnesMethodology
Remember these completely satisfied-go-fortunate Democratic tire slashers in Milwaukee through the final presidential election?
Son of a gun, if they didn’t just wrap issues up. Who says justice isn’t swift? In response to The Milwaukee Sentinel Journal On-line, things are finally winding down now, greater than fifteen months after the incidents: After a two-week felony trial culminating with notes from a conflicted jury, four Kerry-Edwards marketing campaign employees – including the sons of U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) and former Appearing Mayor Marvin Pratt – had their charges in the Election Day 2004 tire-slashing lowered to misdemeanors and accepted the deal.
And who says justice isn’t fair? A dumbed-down cost from felony to misdemeanor, now that’s truthful for a practicing Democrat simply making an attempt to make the playing discipline a bit more degree. One brave soul held out and acquired off: The fifth Democratic staffer accused of crippling Republican vans received a jury acquittal by sticking with a fight in opposition to the felony charge.
There’s a close name for you: this one will need to have nerves of steel. All that is left to do is for the boys to pool their cash and pay restitution a total of $5,317.Forty five and they can overlook the person $10,000.00 fines that may accompany misdemeanors of this type. They don’t should serve the advisable nine month jail time, either: All five defendants had been charged with damaging forty tires on 25 rented vans parked outdoors Republican Get together workplaces on W. Capitol Drive, hours earlier than they have been to be deployed for electioneering. The restore costs easily exceeded the felony threshold of $2,500, but there was little evidence about what every man had allegedly achieved.
Prosecutors built most of their case on testimony from out-of-state Democratic operatives who had come to work on the Wisconsin marketing campaign alongside the defendants – Michael Pratt, 33, Lewis G. Caldwell, 29, Lavelle Mohammad, 36, Justin Howell, 21, and Sowande Omokunde, 26. The witnesses said the native men boasted about their crippling assault on the Republican automobiles.
Dear, expensive. “Boasting,have been they? That’s so Michael Moore.
Properly, at the least they’re free and ready for getting out the vote in 2006. Or are they planning to maintain the voters at home once more? That is one approach to win elections in Milwaukee, especially if you are afraid you’d lose in any other case.
Good poll employees don’t let other poll staff vandalize the competitors.
Perhaps the boys might be “sentenced” to write that out a thousand occasions. Hearts and minds have been certainly modified when Sister Agnes employed this technique. Perhaps the court may strive it.
It additionally has the benefit of being a cheaper type of punishment than having the taxpayers of Milwaukee pay to home 5 thugs.
Hat tip: The Widespread Room
Posted by Dymphna at 1/24/2006 12:47:00 AM 9 feedback E-mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Monday, January 23, 2006
The latest Phrase From the Left
Frequent Goals is kind of a site. Not attention-grabbing sufficient to link to, nevertheless especially since their banner carries that infamous doctored photo from Code Pink.
Remember this revelation from Little Green Footballs, via Publius Pundit?. Publius exhibited the unique phot, plus the doctored one issued by Code Pink for their propaganda purposes. I suppose CP thought they’d pulled a quick one. At any charge, LGF put them together for our edification.Nevertheless, that’s not the worst of what they’ve on offer. Today’s sample is a neologism they seem to have coined for Cindy Sheehan and those of her ilk (yes, I notice I do not often seek advice from, mention, or in any other case allude to a poor human being who has long since abandoned dwelling for the halls of lunacy. However, other than the icky, faux photograph, this specific put up’s juxtaposition of snide ire and irrelevance is interesting in a creepy kind of means).
Have you ever heard of matriotism? Fortunate you. A minimum of until now you’ve been fortunate, because you’re about to see a bit of progressive thought progression. But before we get there, consider the Left’s sleight-of-hand with the phrase “progressive.Like the time period “pro-abortion,the Left was forced to give you another word for Leftist, on condition that it has fallen into such disrepute. Professional-abortion has come to imply support for partial-birth murders abortions, so it needed to be modified to “pro-choice.Good euphemism; a lot much less grisly than the reality. The identical goes for “Progressiveand “Leftist.The previous is simply a lot much less grisly than reality, isn’t it?
So what’s the brand new reality word? Why it’s matriotism! Isn’t that sweeter than that ugly old male patriotism the best is at all times spouting off about? Patriotism is a murderer, matriotism is a mom. Get it? Here’s nasty previous patriotism a la Widespread Desires: There have been volumes written about patriotism, defining it, supporting it, difficult the notion of it, and so on. I believe the notion of patriotism has been expediently and nefariously exploited, and used to lead our nation into scores of disastrous and unnecessary wars. The thought of patriotism has nearly wiped out whole generations of our treasured younger individuals and has allowed our nation’s leaders to commit mass homicide on an unprecedented scale. The vile sputum of “if you are not with us, then you’re in opposition to us” is principally the epitome of patriotism gone wild.
Ugly, ugly. Nasty leaders/killers. “Vile sputumcertainly. Don’t you marvel why they don’t just get straight to the purpose and simply say “vile sperm in spite of everything, aren’t these “the girl is better” thinkers?
But what of matriotism, you say? Here it is, although sadly it was aborted by our leaders “jumping on the bandwagon(the stomach?) of 9/eleven: After the tragedy of 9/11 we had been on our strategy to changing into a fledgling Matriotic society till our leaders jumped on the bandwagon of inappropriate and misguided vengeance to ship our young folks to die and kill in two countries that have been no menace to the USA or to our way of life. The neocons exploited patriotism to fulfill their goals of imperialism and plumder[sic].
This kind of patriotism begins once we enter kindergarten and learn the nationalist “Pledge of Allegiance.” It transcends all sense when we are taught the “Star Spangled Banner,” a hymn to warfare. In our historical past courses the genocide of the Native American peoples is glossed over as we learn concerning the unfold of American Imperialism over our continent, although it wasn’t named till the 1840’s, when the doctrine of Manifest Future was expounded to justify the USA’s conquest of and “civilizing” of Mexican territories and Native American populations. Manifest Destiny sought to unfold the “the boundaries of freedom” to the American Continent, with the notion that we’ve a particular mission from God. Sound familiar?
My heavens, after all it sounds familiar. It’s the identical mantra we’ve been hearing since the 1930’s Pink Diaper babies. It’s outdated, expensive progressives. So outdated, it’s regressive, not to say simplistically incorrect. One problem with Progressives is that they believe history started on this continent. Never do we hear a comparability between America’s beginnings and growth with that of Europe’s. Never will we see an admission that had we not been willing to fight they’d all be talking German or Russian and for darn positive they wouldn’t be running a blog this faux historical past. Oh, wait a minute, this is matriotism: it’s herstory, not historical past. Foolish me.
Here’s another sample of the easy, kindly method of matriotism: Not everyone is a mom, however there is one universal truth that nobody can dispute irrespective of how arduous they fight (and imagine me, some will attempt): Everyone has a mother! Mothers give life, and if the baby is fortunate, mothers nurture life. And if a man has had a nurturing mother he will have already got a base of Matriotism.
I think that’s enough, don’t you? This evisceration of history and intellectual thought is sad, sad, sad/p>
Ohmygod. I used to be about to shut the page when i looked additional down the publish. This factor was written by Mom Matriot herself! No marvel it made me think of Mrs. Sheehan: she wrote this excrescence. I had no thought. As the Irish would say, “aye, the puir woman. Can’t assist herself./p>
Just exhibits you God has a sense of humor. Let us pray that one day He shares it with Casey’s momma. She badly wants it if she’s to make it through the rest of her life.
A word to my commenters. Sure, I should have known that Common Goals was related to Mrs. Sheehan. But we stay a sheltered life right here at Gates. In addition to, what are you guys doing at that dive?
Posted by Dymphna at 1/23/2006 07:50:00 PM 12 comments Electronic mail ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
On Being Amazoned for Being a Conservative Creator
Dear Amazon and Mr. Jeff Bezos:
We each know you’re an enormous Deal and we both like that. Success is wonderful. Among different good features, your capability to move merchandise is exceptional and your pages are very consumer friendly. As you might have expanded into other areas, I have adopted you there and made purchases aside from books. Approach again when, who’d have thought one may buy underwear on Amazon? Or chef’s knives?
I feel sufficient of your service to have ordered your credit card and use the coupons which it generates in order to purchase books from Amazon.com. However, until you remedy the current downside that conservative writers expertise in your site, I’m going to cancel my credit card and move on.
I just looked at Fred Barnese book right here. The cover of the book is intact this time, though the last view confirmed some hacker’s model of President Bush in handcuffs with the title “Felon in Chief,which you’ll view right here, at Michelle Malkin’s site. Ms. Malkin calls what has happened “The Amazon.com Overview Cesspool.This is an accurate assessment of the phenomenon which conservative writers and readers experience.
Of course you already know this is an on-going problem. Kate O’Beirne is one other conservative author who’s being amazoned. The National Evaluation Online editor, Kathryn Jean Lopez, calls it “The Sacking of Kate O’Beirne./p>
The insulting feedback amount to nothing greater than ad hominem assaults on these books, their subjects, and on the authors. Mr. Barnes is a revered writer; I’ve learn his work on political subjects for decades now and communicate from the direct experience. Unfortunately, I suspect that the majority of your over-the-high commenters on conservative books neither purchase nor learn these works. They’re simply on the site to trash the messenger and his message.
As for Ms. O’Beirne, I’ve learn her columns for a while and had deliberate to purchase the book from you. Nevertheless, I hesitate to present my money to a business which does not protect its authors from illegitimate hazing.
Here’s a suggestion: both have your commenters on a selected e-book be ready to indicate proof of having bought this item on Amazon or block their comments. You’ve the aptitude to do this. Whether or not you are keen to risk the ire of Leftists who’re bent on spoiling issues is one other matter. If commenters neither buy the e book from you nor read it in every other approach, why grant them the privilege of commenting on what you might have on provide? Their habits lacks integrity. In case you fail to address this concern, your group will endure the same character defect.
On precept I do not consider in boycotts. They’re a legacy from the ’60’s Left, and are little greater than a form of bullying. In addition to, they’re not effective. Nevertheless, I additionally consider in the ability of alternative. Unless you are willing to deal with huge, and massively unfair, assaults in a well timed method, I will — with remorse — make my purchases elsewhere.
Will you miss our business? Not much. Will we really feel higher not having to go through garbage so as to take a look at a e book and buy it? You guess.
I would be loath to cease doing enterprise with Amazon, Mr. Bezos, but like the remainder of us, you aren’t indispensable. I do hope you can see your way to motive, fairness, and above all integrity on this matter.